Rodriguez v. Martel
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/06/10 DENYING petitioner's 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:kly/4 rodr3205.110b
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FABIAN RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, vs. M. MARTEL, Respondent. / Petitioner has filed a second request for the appointment of counsel. As the court explained in its March 10, 2010 order, there currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). Therefore, for the reasons explained in the court's March 10 order, petitioner's second request will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's April 14, 2010, request for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 19) is denied. DATED: May 6, 2010. ORDER No. CIV-09-3205 GEB DAD P
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
