Wagner v. Posner et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/26/2010 DENYING pltf's 15 motion to amend and 16 motion for access to the law library and legal materials. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MOSS POSNER, et al., Defendants. / On March 12, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to amend his complaint to include as an exhibit a copy of the Director's Level Decision denying his administrative appeal (Dkt. No. 15). A copy of this decision is attached to the motion. Plaintiff did not file a proposed amended complaint. Piecemeal amendment of complaints is not permitted. See Local Rule 220. Accordingly, the motion to amend is denied. In any event, plaintiff is not required to attach a copy of the Director's Level Decision to his complaint in order to proceed with this action. On March 23, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that he be granted adequate access to the law library and legal materials (Dkt. No. 16). Plaintiff generally alleges that his access to the law library and legal materials is inadequate. On March 25, 2010 plaintiff filed a 142 page motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 17). Plaintiff's ability to prepare and file 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLINTON WAGNER, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-3166 FCD KJN P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
this lengthy motion undercuts his claim of inadequate access to the law library and legal materials. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for access to the law library and legal materials is denied as not well supported. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend (Dkt. No. 15) is denied; 2. Plaintiff's motion for access to the law library and legal materials (Dkt. No. 16) is denied. DATED: May 26, 2010
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
wag3166.ll
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
