Thomas v. California Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/6/2010 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED w/out prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The order and service documents were served on plaintiff on March 12, 2010 and returned undelivered on March 19, 2010. On March 29, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, and on March 31, 2010, the order and service documents were re-served on plaintiff at his new address of record. More than thirty days has passed since the date of re-service. 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN PAUL THOMAS, Plaintiff, vs. CALIFORNIA INTERSTATE COMMISSION FOR ADULT OFFENDER SUPERVISION, Defendant. / Plaintiff, the only party who has appeared in this action, has consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Consent filed November 30, 2009. By order filed March 12, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.1 ///// ORDER No. 2:09-cv-3142-JFM (PC)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
12 th o m 3 1 4 2 . f u s m
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: May 6, 2010.
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
