Williams v. Clark
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/21/2011. Upon reconsideration, the 10/5/2011 Magistrate Judge's 51 Order is AFFIRMED. (Marciel, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS,
11
Petitioner,
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-09-2968 JAM CKD P
A HEDGPETH,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
On October 19, 2011, petitioner filed a request for reconsideration of the
17
magistrate judge’s order filed October 5, 2011, denying petitioner’s request for a fourth extension
18
of time to file an amended petition. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s
19
orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire
20
file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly
21
erroneous or contrary to law.
22
////
23
////
24
////
25
////
26
////
1
1
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
2
magistrate judge filed October 5, 2011 , is affirmed.
3
DATED: November 21, 2011
4
5
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
