Johnson v. Devries et al
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER 19 for Dismissal of parties signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/25/2010. Defendants Donald Devries and Kathleen Devries are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case shall stay open with remaining defendants. (Marciel, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 09-cv-02731-WBS-KJN STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DONALD DEVRIES; KATHLEEN DEVRIES AND Proposed ORDER
Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff, vs.
Donald Devries, et al, Complaint Filed: October 1, 2009 Defendants CASE TO BE REMAINED OPEN WITH REMAINING DEFENDANTS
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendants (Donald Devries; Kathleen Devries) be and are hereby dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to be remained open with remaining Defendants. Defendants (Donald Devries; Kathleen Devries) are dismissed because these Defendants are not proper parties to this action.
1 STIPULATED DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-09-02731-WBS-KJN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: March 18, 2010
/s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff GURNEE & DANIELS, LLP
Dated: March 18, 2010
/s/Candace H. Shirley______________ CANDACE H. SHIRLEY, Attorney for Defendants, DONALD DEVRIES; KATHLEEN DEVRIES
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 25, 2010
2 STIPULATED DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-09-02731-WBS-KJN
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
