Khan et al v. Napolitano et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 03/31/10 ORDERING that the time for the gov't to answer the complaint is EXTENDED to 05/25/10. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2729 Attorneys for Defendants
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NARGIS KHAN, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV S 09-2617 MCE KJM THIRD JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; ORDER
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: By: Dated: March 19, 2010
This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs have challenged the delay in the processing of Suriya Khan's visa application. The parties respectfully inform the Court that they are making progress toward an administrative resolution to the matter, and expect the administrative process to be concluded promptly. Accordingly, the parties stipulate to a third 60-day extension of time for the government to file its answer to the complaint, until May 25, 2010.
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney
/s/Audrey Hemesath Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants /s/ Robert B. Jobe Robert B. Jobe Attorney for the Plaintiffs -1-
1 2 3 ORDER 4 Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY 5 ORDERED that the time for the government to answer the complaint is extended to May 25, 6 2010. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 31, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
