Broussard v. Chrones, et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 05/20/10 AFFIRMING 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Williams, D)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. LEA ANN CHRONES, et al., Defendants. / On May 14, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed April 29, 2010, denying plaintiff's motions for appointment of counsel and permitting plaintiff to file an amended complaint consistent with the order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed April 29, 2010 (Doc. No. 14), is affirmed. DATED: May 20, 2010 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, JR., Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2506 WBS DAD P
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
