Hayes v. D.K. Sisto
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 03/29/10 ordering respondent is directed to file an answer within 45 days from the date of this order. Petitioner's traverse, if any is due on or before 30 days from the date respondents' answer is filed. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 20, 2010, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned in a related case order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer within forty-five days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; ///// ///// ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLARENCE JOSEPH HAYES, Petitioner, No. 2:09-cv-2433-WBS-JFM (HC)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
/014.haye2433.100
2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondents' answer is filed; DATED: March 29, 2010.
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
