Randhawa v. Skylux, Inc., et al.
Filing
116
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/11 CONTINUING Status Conference to 12/12/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb; ORDERING that upon completion of or default in proceeding with the arbitration, Shannon Calln et and Interactive will inform the court and file appropriate documents for the completion or continuation of this action; andthat no later than two weeks before the conference, the parties shall file a joint status report setting forth the status of the arbitration and suggesting a schedule for further proceedings in this court. (Meuleman, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
----oo0oo----
10
11
12
MOHIT RANDHAWA aka HARPAL
SINGH; SHANNON CALLNET PVT
LTD,
NO. CIV. 2:09-2304 WBS KJN
ORDER RE: STATUS CONFERENCE
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiffs,
v.
SKYLUX INC., INTERACTIVE
INTELLIGENCE, INC., MUJEEB
PUZHAKKARAILLATH, SKYLUX
TELELINK PVT LTD; and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
/
19
----oo0oo---20
21
Plaintiffs Mohit Randhawa aka Harpal Singh and Shannon
22
Callnet Pvt. Ltd. (“Shannon Callnet”) filed this action against
23
defendants Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (“Interactive”),
24
Skylux, Inc., Mujeeb Puzhakkaraillath, and Skylux Telelink Pvt.
25
Ltd. (the latter three collectively “Skylux defendants”),
26
alleging state law claims arising from contracts for an India-
27
based calling center and software.
28
court stayed all claims against Interactive, which are subject to
1
On October 18, 2010, the
1
arbitration, and all claims against the Skylux defendants, which
2
are not subject to arbitration.
(Docket No. 102.)
According to the parties’ Joint Status Report, as of
3
4
June 13, 2011, Interactive has filed an answer to Shannon
5
Callnet’s demand for arbitration and Shannon Callnet has paid its
6
fee “to the American Arbitration Association in order to proceed
7
with the further administration of the arbitration and
8
appointment of the arbitrator.”
9
(Docket No. 114).)
(Joint Status Report at 2:1-2
The parties propose a continuation of the
10
stay and another status conference in six months.
11
(Id. at 2:6-
13.)
12
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
13
(1) The Status Conference scheduled for June 27, 2011,
14
is vacated;
15
(2) Upon completion of or default in proceeding with
16
the arbitration, Shannon Callnet and Interactive will inform the
17
court and file appropriate documents for the completion or
18
continuation of this action; and
19
(3) This case is set for a Status Conference at 2:00
20
p.m. on December 12, 2011, in Courtroom No. 5.
21
weeks before the conference, the parties shall file a joint
22
status report setting forth the status of the arbitration and
23
suggesting a schedule for further proceedings in this court.
24
DATED:
June 23, 2011
25
26
27
28
2
No later than two
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
