(HC) Perez v. Harrington, No. 2:2009cv02278 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/15/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Perez v. Harrington Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE CARLOS PEREZ, 11 Petitioner, vs. 12 13 KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent. 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 16 17 No. CIV S-09-2278 JAM EFB P U.S.C. § 2254. 18 On October 13, 2010, respondent moved to dismiss the petition as containing 19 unexhausted claims. On June 17, 2010, the court informed petitioner of the requirements for 20 filing an opposition to any motion to dismiss. On December 7, 2010, the court again 21 admonished petitioner of his obligation to file an opposition or statement of no opposition. That 22 order gave petitioner an additional 30 days to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition 23 and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 24 dismissed. Petitioner was granted a further extension of thirty days to file his opposition by 25 order filed January 12, 2011. 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 The 30 days have passed and petitioner has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition nor otherwise responded to the June 30, 2010 order. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Rule 12, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 7 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 8 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 9 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 10 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 11 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). In 12 his objections petitioner may address whether a certificate of appealability should issue in the 13 event he files an appeal of the judgment in this case. See Rule 11, Federal Rules Governing 14 Section 2254 Cases (the district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it 15 enters a final order adverse to the applicant). 16 Dated: March 15, 2011. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
