Pantalion v. Resmae Mortgage Corporation et al, No. 2:2009cv02262 - Document 42 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 06/22/10 and ORDERING that the 11 01/28/10 Motion to Dismiss by dfts Wilshire Credit Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., M errill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., and Merrill Lynch Investors Trust Series 2006 RM5, is GRANTED and these dfts are DISMISSED w/ prejudice; and the 17 02/17/10 Motion to Dismiss by dft ResMAE is GRANTED and this dft is DISMISSED w/ prejudice. (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Pantalion v. Resmae Mortgage Corporation et al Doc. 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARITY MAE PANTALION, 12 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-02262-MCE-GGH Plaintiff, vs. ORDER RESMAE MORT. CORP., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 __________________________________/ 17 On May 13, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on May 27, 20 2010, defendants filed a reply to the objections on June 10, 2010, and they were considered by 21 the district judge. 22 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which 23 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 24 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As 25 to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court 26 assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s 2 conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 3 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 4 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 5 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, 6 IT IS ORDERED that: 7 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 13, 2010, are ADOPTED; 8 2. The motion to dismiss, filed January 28, 2010, by defendants Wilshire Credit 9 Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, 10 Inc., and Merrill Lynch Investors Trust Series 2006 RM5, is granted and these defendants are 11 dismissed with prejudice; and 12 13 14 3. The motion to dismiss, filed February 17, 2010, by defendant ResMAE is granted, and this defendant is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: June 22, 2010 15 16 17 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
