(PC) Isgrigg v. Heynie et al, No. 2:2009cv01905 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/20/10 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 10 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Richard L. Isgrigg. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Isgrigg v. Heynie et al Doc. 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD L. ISGRIGG, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-09-1905 GEB GGH P R. HEYNIE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By an order filed June 4, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return 17 to the court, within fourteen days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. 18 That fourteen day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the 19 court’s order. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 23 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 24 fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 25 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 2 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 3 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: July 20, 2010 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 /isgr1905.fusm2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
