(PC) Isgrigg v. Heynie et al, No. 2:2009cv01905 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/26/10 ADOPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. This action is DISMISSED against defendants Hatch, Walker, Rios, Dragosh and Hubbard. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
(PC) Isgrigg v. Heynie et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD L. ISGRIGG, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-09-1905 GEB GGH P R. HEYNIE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 302. 19 On January 19, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed against defendants Hatch, Walker, Rios, Dragosh and 4 Hubbard. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 5 Dated: March 26, 2010 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.