Blanton v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER 25 to Amend the Scheduling Order, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/28/11. No new discovery will be propounded after 7/5/11; depositions properly noticed prior to the current discovery deadline of 8/4/11 may be ta ken up to 60 days following said deadline to accommodate scheduling conflicts; the discovery cutoff for obtaining and enforcing discovery motions related to depositions as identified within paragraph 2 above shall be 60 days following the final deposition, and all other discovery, including any motions related to any written discovery, are subject to the current discovery cut off of 8/4/11.(Kastilahn, A).
<![CDATA[
1
4
ANTHONY T. CASO, No. 88561
Law Office of Anthony T. Caso
8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100
Sacramento, California 95826
Telephone: (916) 386-4432
Facsimile: (916) 307-5164
E-Mail: tom@caso-law.com
5
Attorney for David Blanton
6
LONGYEAR, O’DEA AND LAVRA, LLP
John A. Lavra, CSB No. 114533
Jeri L. Pappone, CSB No. 210104
Amy B. Lindsey-Doyle CSB No. 242205
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Telephone: (916) 974-8500
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff’s
Department, Chris Bittle, Donald Bricker, and Kenneth King
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
DAVID BLANTON,
16
17
18
19
20
21
) Case No.: 2:09-CV-01832-MCE-KJM
)
Plaintiff,
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND
v.
)
THE SCHEDULING ORDER
)
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
) .
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
)
DEPARTMENT, CHRIS BITTLE, DONALD )
BRICKER, KENNETH KING, and
)
CRYSTAL FISCHER BRADNAX,
)
Defendants.
)
)
22
23
24
Plaintiff and Defendants County of Sacramento (erroneously sued as the Sacramento County
25
Sheriff’s Department), Chris Bittle, Donald Bricker and Kenneth King by and through their
26
respective counsel hereby stipulate and request changes to the current Status ( Pretrial Scheduling)
27
Order. Defendant Crystal Fischer Bradnax was served via substituted service on September 23,
28
2010, and has yet to appear in this action.
Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order – No. 2:09-CV-01832-MCE-KJM
1
1
Good cause exists for the modification to permit the Plaintiff to take properly noticed
2
depositions that due to scheduling conflicts of the parties and their counsel cannot occur until after
3
the current discovery deadline of August 4. Defendants have already conducted written discovery
4
and taken the deposition of Plaintiff, thereby completing its intended discovery. Plaintiff has timely
5
propounded his written discovery and timely noticed certain depositions. Counsel have met and
6
conferred and in accommodation of the witnesses schedules and the schedules of counsel, the
7
properly noticed depositions cannot occur until after August 4.
8
9
In order to facilitate agreement between the parties on the scheduling of remaining
depositions, the parties stipulate to a change in the court’s scheduling order as follows:
10
1. No new discovery will be propounded after July 5, 2011.
11
2. Depositions properly noticed prior to the current discovery deadline of August 4, 2011
12
may be taken after said deadline to accommodate scheduling conflicts;
13
3. The discovery cutoff for obtaining and enforcing discovery motions related to depositions
14
15
16
as identified within paragraph 2 above shall be 60 days following the final deposition.
4. All other discovery, including any motions related to any written discovery are subject to
the current discovery cut off of August 4, 2011.
17
18
DATED: June 24, 2011.
19
Respectfully submitted,
20
ANTHONY T. CASO
21
/s/ ANTHONY T. CASO
Attorney for Plaintiff
22
23
LONGYEAR, O’DEA AND LAVRA, LLP
24
/s JOHN LAVRA
Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento,
Chris Bittle, Donald Bricker, and Kenneth King
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order – No. 2:09-CV-01832-MCE-KJM
2
1
ORDER
2
3
4
Based on the stipulation between the parties, the scheduling order is hereby amended as
follows:
5
1. No new discovery will be propounded after July 5, 2011.
6
2. Depositions properly noticed prior to the current discovery deadline of August 4, 2011
7
may be taken up to sixty (60) days following said deadline to accommodate scheduling
8
conflicts;
9
3. The discovery cutoff for obtaining and enforcing discovery motions related to depositions
10
11
12
13
14
as identified within paragraph 2 above shall be sixty (60) days following the final deposition.
4. All other discovery, including any motions related to any written discovery, are subject to
the current discovery cut off of August 4, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: June 28, 2011
15
______________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order – No. 2:09-CV-01832-MCE-KJM
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
