-EFB (PS) Collins v. Chesapeake Commons Holdings, LLC. et al, No. 2:2009cv01816 - Document 36 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/7/11 ADOPTING 35 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 28 SHRA's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Donati, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PS) Collins v. Chesapeake Commons Holdings, LLC. et al Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICIA L. COLLINS, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 14 No. CIV S-09-1816 KJM EFB PS CHESAPEAKE COMMONS HOLDINGS, LLC; SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; and DOES 1-20, 15 16 Defendants. __________________________________/ 17 ORDER On June 28, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 21 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to 24 be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 28, 2011, are 3 4 5 ADOPTED; and 2. SHRA’s motion for summary judgment (ECF 28) is granted. DATED: August 7, 2011. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
