County of Sacramento et al v. Aerojet- General Corporation et al
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER 30 for further stay of action, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/26/10: Subject only to Paragraph 4 of this order, this action is STAYED until 11/30/10, the Joint Status Report is DUE on 12/28/10, and dfts have until 1/10/11, to respond to the first amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN A Professional Corporation
SOMACH, SIMMONS & DUNN STUART L. SOMACH (State Bar No. 090959; ssomach@somachlaw.com) 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone (916) 446-7979; Facsimile (916) 446-8199 Attorneys for Plaintiffs COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY RICHARD C. COFFIN (State Bar No. 70562; rcc@bcltlaw.com) BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP 350 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1435 Telephone (415) 228-5400; Facsimile (415) 228-5450 Attorneys for Defendants THE BOEING COMPANY and MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION LAWRENCE A. HOBEL, (State Bar No. 73364; lhobel@cov.com) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, California 94111-53536 Telephone (415) 591-7028; Facsimile (415) 955-6528 BRIAN SWEENEY, (State Bar No. 195999, brian.sweeney@aerojet.com) AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION P.O. Box 13222, Dept. 0106 Sacramento, California 95813-6000 Telephone (916) 351-8588; Facsimile (916) 351-8610 Attorneys for Defendants AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY, Plaintiffs, v. AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION; THE BOEING COMPANY; McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION Defendants. Case No. 2:09-CV-01814-MCE-EFB
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION FOR FURTHER STAY OF ACTION; ORDER
Date: No Hearing Requested Time: N/A Courtroom: 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN A Professional Corporation
WHEREAS, under this Court's Stipulated Order of November 13, 2009, the Parties are required to file a Joint Status Report and Rule 26(b) Discovery Plan in the abovecaptioned matter by June 30, 2010; WHEREAS, under the Court's Stipulated Order of November 13, 2009, Defendants have until June 30, 2010, to file a response to the First Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, the Parties continue to engage in meaningful settlement discussions, and believe that a further stay of the litigation until November 30, 2010 is in the best interest of all Parties, will promote judicial efficiency, and will reduce litigation costs because it will allow the Parties to focus on such discussions; WHEREAS, for these reasons, the Parties jointly seek this Court's Order to stay the litigation until November 30, 2010, and to establish new dates for the filing of the Joint Status Report and for Defendants' response to the First Amended Complaint; THEREFORE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Plaintiffs and Defendants that 1. Subject only to paragraph 4 below, the action be stayed until November 30, 2010, including all obligations pursuant to Rule 26, and any obligation to respond to the First Amended Complaint. 2. Subject only to paragraph 4 below, the Joint Status Report is due on December 28, 2010. 3. Subject only to paragraph 4 below, Defendants shall have until January 10, 2011, to respond to the First Amended Complaint. 4. If any party determines that the settlement discussions are not sufficiently productive, the party may file and serve a request that the stay be lifted, and the stay shall be lifted sixty (60) days after the Court issues an Order lifting the stay. If the stay is lifted prior to November 30, 2010, the Court will set the last day for Defendants to file their responsive pleadings, and the last day for the parties to file their Joint Status Report, for a day no less than thirty (30) days after the stay is lifted. ///
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN A Professional Corporation
DATED: May 21, 2010
BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP By: /s/ Richard C. Coffin Richard C. Coffin Attorneys for Defendant THE BOEING COMPANY and MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION
DATED: May 21, 2010
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: /s/ Lawrence A. Hobel Lawrence A. Hobel Attorneys for Defendant AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED: May 21, 2010
SOMACH, SIMMONS & DUNN By: /s/ Stuart L. Somach Stuart L. Somach Attorneys for Plaintiffs COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 26, 2010 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
