Maggio v. Dickinson
Filing
20
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 6/6/2011 ORDERING that Respondent comply with the May 25, 2011 production order or show cause for her failure to comply by June 10, 2011. (Duong, D)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SALVATORE CARMELO MAGGIO,
11
Petitioner,
12
2: 09 - cv - 1606 - LKK TJB
vs.
13
KATHLEEN DICKINSON,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
________________________________/
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for writ of habeas
17
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In one of his claims Petitioner argues that he was unable to
18
testify on his own behalf at trial due to his mental condition, thereby violating his Constitutional
19
rights. Respondent answered the petition on January 21, 2010 and lodged several documents
20
including the Clerk’s Transcript. The California Court of Appeal’s decision and the petition both
21
cite to the reports of Dr. Warburton and Dr. Hoffman regarding Petitioner’s competency to stand
22
trial. However, these two reports were omitted from Respondent’s lodged documents. (See
23
Clerk’s Tr. at p. 57-74.)
24
On May 25, 2011, Respondent was ordered to file these two reports within seven days (by
25
June 1, 2011). To date, Respondent has not complied nor responded to the May 25, 2011 order.
26
Respondent must comply with the May 25, 2011 order or show cause for the failure to comply.
1
1
2
Failure to comply with this order may result in monetary sanctions.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent comply with the May 25, 2011
3
production order or show cause for her failure to comply by June 10, 2011.
4
DATED: June 6, 2011
5
6
7
TIMOTHY J BOMMER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
