Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership v. Lake Tahoe Development Company, LLC, No. 2:2009cv01533 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/26/2010 ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations. Pltfs' 19 Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED. Injunctive relief is GRANTED as specified in Pltf's proposed judgment which is approved as to form and substance. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership v. Lake Tahoe Development Company, LLC Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HEAVENLY VALLEY, LP, et al., Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 CIV-S-09-1533 FCD GGH LAKE TAHOE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, 14 Defendant. 15 16 ORDER __________________________________/ 17 On July 23, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 20 21 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 23, 2010, are ADOPTED; 3 2. Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, filed April 15, 2010( docket #19) is 4 5 GRANTED; and 3. Injunctive relief is granted as specified in plaintiff’s proposed judgment which 6 is approved as to form and substance. 7 DATED: August 26, 2010. 8 9 10 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.