Singh v. Martel
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 06/27/11 ORDERING that the 30 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; petitioner's objections to the 27 F&Rs are due 07/23/11. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ASHMINDAR JEET SINGH,
11
12
13
14
Petitioner,
vs.
MICHAEL MARTEL,
Respondent.
15
16
No. CIV S-09-1453 GEB CHS
ORDER
/
Petitioner Singh is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an amended petition for
17
writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 4, 2011, findings and
18
recommendations were filed herein recommending that the petition be denied. Petitioner has
19
moved for a second extension of time in which to file objections to the findings and
20
recommendations. Petitioner indicates that the Mule Creek State Prison law library has not been
21
operating on a regular program and that he has still been unable to access five cases cited in the
22
findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, petitioner’s June 23, 2011 motion for
23
extension of time is granted. Petitioner’s objections are due on or before July 23, 2011.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
DATED: June 27, 2011
26
CHARLENE H. SORRENTINO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
