(PC) Andreozzi v. California Department of Corrections et al, No. 2:2009cv01192 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/10 ORDERING that The FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 5/4/10 18 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants California Medical Facility Vacaville; B Cocaran; Garcia; S Jimenez; D Mobley; Pudding; J Richard; M Beais and California Department of Corrections are DISMISSED from this action. This Action shall proceed against defendant Lesane only. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Andreozzi v. California Department of Corrections et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEROY ARTHER ANDREOZZI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CIV S-09-1192-JAM-CMK-P vs. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On May 4, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 4, 2010, are adopted in full; 3 2. The following defendants are dismissed from this action as the amended 4 complaint fails to state a claim against them: California Department of Corrections, California 5 Medical Facility Vacaville, M. Beais, B. Cocaran, J. Richard, Pudding, S. Jimenez, Garcia, and 6 D. Mobley; and 7 8 3. This action shall proceed against defendant Lesane only. DATED: June 17, 2010 9 /s/ John A. Mendez 10 U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
