(PC) Sadiq v. Roberts, No. 2:2009cv01171 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/23/10 ORDERING that the 18 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Pltf's due process claim against Roberts, as well as his claims against defts Flores, Scavetta and Ferguson are dismissed without prejudice. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Sadiq v. Roberts Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JABIR SADIQ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-09-1171 LKK EFB P vs. LT. ROBERTS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 5, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 5, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s due process claim against Roberts, as well as his claims against 4 defendants Flores, Scavetta and Ferguson are dismissed without prejudice. 5 DATED: September 23, 2010. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.