Guevara v. Ralls et al
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/4/10 ORDERING that 41 and 42 Motions for production of documents shall be placed in the court file and disregarded. (Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. A. RALLS, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has filed documents entitled "motion for production of documents." Plaintiff is informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party's responses should be filed until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's March 1, 2010 motions for production of documents will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of //// //// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMILCAR GUEVARA, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-1132 FCD KJN P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed. DATED: March 4, 2010
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
gue v1 1 3 2 .4 1 1
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
