Clinton v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/26/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 7 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS CLIFTON, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, DAVE SHAW, EDMUND G. BROWN JR., MATHEW CATE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JAN SCULLY, ROBERT BURNS, GERALD T. SHEA, DAVID GRANT, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INSPECTOR GENERAL GLEN A. FINN, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL JEFF STEEL, JOHN DOE ONE, JOHN DOE TWO, JOHN DOE THREE, JOHN DOE FOUR,
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:09-cv-01093-GEB-GGH ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION*
On December 4, 2009 Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration in which it appears he wants the dismissal of his case to be reconsidered because "[o]n October 20, 2009, Magistrate Brennan issued an order granting amendment" of Plaintiff's complaint. 1). (Mot.
The order granting Plaintiff leave to amend, however, was issued
in another case, Clifton v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al., 2:09-cv1351-FCD-EFB. In this case, an order adopting the findings and
recommendations of Magistrate Judge Gregory Hollows dismissing this
argument.
This matter is deemed to be suitable for decision without oral E.D. Cal. R. 230(g). 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
case was issued on November 30, 2009. leave to amend in this case. reconsideration is denied. Dated: February 26, 2010
Plaintiff has not been given
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
