Team One Networking v. Eatmon et al - Document 60

Court Description:

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/3/2011 ORDERING that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court shall retain retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

1 2 3 Randall C. Nelson, State Bar No. 138298 CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST A Law Corporation 420 Redcliff Drive Redding, California 96002 (530) 222-2100; FAX (530) 222-0504 4 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Jason Eatmon, individually and d/b/a KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; Dan Lockwood, individually and d/b/a KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; and Defendant Development Group, Inc., a California corporation 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TEAM ONE NETWORKING, a California Corporation; ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JASON EATMON, individually and d/b/a ) KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; ) DAN LOCKWOOD, individually and d/b/a ) KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; ) DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., a ) California corporation; and DOES 1 ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) ) AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. ) ______________________________________ ) NO. 2:09-CV-00903-WBS-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF ACTION The Honorable William B. Shubb WHEREAS, Team One Networking, Inc. (“Team One”) filed an action against Jason 23 Eatmon, Dan Lockwood, Development Group, Inc. and KDJ Enterprises (collectively referred 24 to as “Defendants”) in the United States District Court, Eastern District, Case 25 No. 2:09-cv-00903 (the “Action”). Jason Eatmon and Dan Lockwood each filed Counterclaims 26 against Team One in the same Action; 1 STIPULATION & ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISMISSAL OF ACTION 1 WHEREAS, Team One and Defendants have reached a full and final confidential 2 settlement of the Action, the terms of which are set forth in a “Confidential Settlement 3 Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims” (“Settlement Agreement”), which has been 4 executed by the parties. 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the parties agree and hereby request that the United 6 States District Court, Eastern District of California, shall retain jurisdiction over the parties to 7 enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement until there is full performance of the terms 8 thereof, which shall have occurred on or before December 31, 2013. 9 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the entire Action shall be dismissed without 10 prejudice. 11 DATED: April 28, 2011. PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON, LLP 12 By /s/Christopher Wohl (as authorized on 04/28/11) Christopher Wohl Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant 13 14 15 DATED: April 28, 2011. CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST 16 By /s/Robert M. Harding Robert M. Harding Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants 17 18 19 ORDER 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing 22 the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 23 DATED: May 3, 2011 24 25 26 2 STIPULATION & ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISMISSAL OF ACTION