Team One Networking v. Eatmon et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER 33 Modifying the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order as to Expert Discovery, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/4/2010. Disclosure of Experts is DUE 6/11/2010. Disclosure of Supplemental Experts is DUE 6/25/2010. Completion of Expert Witness Discovery is DUE 7/9/2010. All other ddls (completion of discovery, motion hearing schedule, final pretrial conference, and trial) will remain unchanged. (Kastilahn, A)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Randall C. Nelson, State Bar No. 138298 CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST A Law Corporation 420 Redcliff Drive Redding, California 96002 (530) 222-2100; FAX (530) 222-0504 Attorneys for Defendants Jason Eatmon, individually and d/b/a KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; Dan Lockwood, individually and d/b/a KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; and Development Group, Inc., a California corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Court's August 5, 2009 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order establishes an expert witness disclosure date of February 12, 2010, a supplemental expert witness disclosure date of April 2, 2010, and a deadline for completion of discovery of May 28, 2010, which would be inclusive of all expert witness discovery. The parties are presently conducting written discovery and contemplate proceeding with all necessary depositions to be completed before discovery deadline. However, due to the 1
STIPULATION & ORDER TO MODIFY THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER RE EXPERT DISCOVERY
TEAM ONE NETWORKING, a California Corporation;
) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JASON EATMON, individually and d/b/a ) KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; ) DAN LOCKWOOD, individually and d/b/a ) KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; ) DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., a ) California corporation; and DOES 1 ) through 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________)
NO. 2:09-CV-00903-WBS-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER RE EXPERT DISCOVERY
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
technical nature of this case and the fact that the determination of appropriate expert witnesses depends to a great extent on deposition testimony to be provided by certain percipient witnesses whose depositions will likely not be taken until March or April of this year, it is apparent to the parties that it is not realistic to disclose expert witnesses and conduct expert witness discovery before the completion of percipient discovery. In order to provide all parties sufficient time to prepare substantive disclosures of expert witnesses and to conduct thorough discovery of expert witnesses, the parties propose to amend the schedule to provide for the following dates: DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS DISCLOSURE OF SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERTS COMPLETION OF EXPERT WITNESS DISCOVERY JUNE 11, 2010 JUNE 25, 2010 JULY 9, 2010
All other deadlines (completion of discovery, motion hearing schedule, final pretrial conference, and trial) will remain unchanged. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: March 4, 2010.
16 PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON LLP 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
STIPULATION & ORDER TO MODIFY THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER RE EXPERT DISCOVERY
By /s/Jennifer L. McQuarrie (as authorized on 03/01/10) Jennifer L. McQuarrie Attorneys for Plaintiff DATED: March 4, 2010. CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST By /s/Randall C. Nelson Randall C. Nelson Attorneys for Defendants Jason Eatmon, individually and d/b/a KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; Dan Lockwood, individually and d/b/a KDJ Enterprises, a general partnership; and Development Group, Inc., a California corporation
1 2 3 DATED: March 4, 2010 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
3
STIPULATION & ORDER TO MODIFY THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER RE EXPERT DISCOVERY
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
