(PC) Davis v. Walker et al, No. 2:2009cv00832 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/25/10 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants James Walker and Beoke are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Davis v. Walker et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ULYSSES DAVIS, JR., 11 Plaintiff, vs. 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-0832 FCD KJN P CHAPLAIN JUMAH, et al, Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 24, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 24, 2010, are adopted in full. 2 2. Defendants Walker and Beoke are dismissed from this action without 3 prejudice. 4 DATED: June 25, 2010 5 6 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
