Doe v. University of the Pacific
Filing
45
SEALING ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 5/7/2010 GRANTING Defendant's Motion 44 to file their Motion for Summary Judgment and, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment UNDER SEAL. (Krueger, M)
<![CDATA[
1 Janine S. Simerly (SBN 102361) jss@millerlawgroup.com 2 Jennifer Cotner (SBN (SBN 255785) jrc@millerlawgroup.com 3 MILLER LAW GROUP A Professional Corporation 4 111 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 5 Tel.: (415) 464-4300 Fax: (415) 464-4336 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC 8 9 10 11 12 JANE DOE, 13
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC'S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (L.R. 39-141)
MILLER LAW GROUP
14 15 v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Plaintiff,
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, Defendant. Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr.
Complaint filed: March 18, 2009 Trial Date: October 19, 2010
Having reviewed Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal (the "Motion") and
25 good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders as follows: Defendant's Motion is hereby 26 GRANTED. 27 28
1
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (L.R. 39-141 (e)) Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM
1
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and, in the Alternative, Partial
2 Summary Judgment, and all supporting pleadings and evidence, may be filed under seal. 3 The Clerk shall maintain these documents pursuant to Local Rule 39-141(e). 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 7, 2010 FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MILLER LAW GROUP
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (L.R. 39-141 (e)) Case No.: 2:09-CV-00764-FCD-KJM
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
