(PC) Armentero v. Knowles et al, No. 2:2009cv00503 - Document 38 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/3/2010 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A); the court notes that pltf's request for counsel and the 35 findings and recommendations are moot. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Armentero v. Knowles et al Doc. 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. CIV S-09-0503 JAM KJM P vs. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff seeks dismissal of this action under Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal 16 17 Rules of Civil Procedure. Because plaintiff has provided the court with the notice required under 18 that rule, and because defendants have not yet filed an answer or a motion for summary 19 judgment, this action is DISMISSED. The court notes that plaintiff also has filed a request for appointment of counsel. 20 21 His request for dismissal is unequivocal, however, making the request for counsel moot. The 22 findings and recommendations filed on October 19 also are moot. 23 DATED: November 3, 2010. 24 25 26 1/kly arme0503.dis Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
