Williams v. Goman et al
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/04/10 denying 9 Motion for legal stationary and denying 10 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:mp:sj will0491.58
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DELBERT WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, vs. GOMAN, et al., Defendants. / On April 26, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for legal stationary and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This civil rights action was closed on December 3, 2009. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for legal stationary (Doc. No. 9) is denied; and 2. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 10) is denied. DATED: May 4, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-09-0491 FCD DAD P
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
