-KJN (PS) Rhodes v. Placer County et al, No. 2:2009cv00489 - Document 151 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/22/2011 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 138 are ADOPTED; Defendants Sacramento County Mental Health Treatment Center, Dorian Kittrell and Frank Patino are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
-KJN (PS) Rhodes v. Placer County et al Doc. 151 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KATHLYN A. RHODES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-00489-MCE-KJN-PS v. ORDER PLACER COUNTY, et al., 15 16 Defendants. __________________________________/ 17 On May 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 21 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 25 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed May 23, 2011 (ECF No. 138), are 3 4 ADOPTED; and 2. Defendants Sacramento County (sued herein as Sacramento County Mental Health 5 Treatment Center (“SCMHTC”)), Dorian Kittrell, and Frank Patino are DISMISSED from this 6 action with prejudice. 7 DATED: June 22, 2011 8 9 10 _______________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.