Jackson v. City of Oroville et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 05/04/10 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEFFREY PAUL JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OROVILLE, KIRK TROSTLE, GIL ZARATE, BILL LAGRONE, JENNIFER McKENZIE, and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants. Plaintiff and defendants, through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. 2. Plaintiffs and Defendants have settled this case to their mutual satisfaction; This case should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the settlement. Case No. 2:09-CV-00398-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
SO STIPULATED
Date: April 9, 2010
/s/ Steven R. Yourke Steven R. Yourke Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: April 9, 2010
/s/ Douglas R. Thorn Douglas R. Thorn Attorney for Defendants
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
ORDER The Court has considered and accepted the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby dismisses this case with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: May 4, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge
-2-
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
