-KJN (PC) Treglia v. Director of California Department of Corrections et al, No. 2:2009cv00352 - Document 61 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/4/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 58 filed 11/24/10 ADOPTED IN FULL; pltf's motion for partial summary judgment 30 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
-KJN (PC) Treglia v. Director of California Department of Corrections et al Doc. 61 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL TREGLIA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:09-cv-0352 MCE KJN P vs. ORDER DIRECTOR OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 24, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 23 Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 2 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 3 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 4 proper analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 24, 2010, are adopted in 7 8 9 10 full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 30) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2011 11 12 13 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.