Secrease v. Walker
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 06/27/11 ORDERING that Respondent shall file copies of Petitioners briefs that he filed to the California Court of Appeal in case number A097806 and to the California Supreme Court in his petition for review in case number S112979 on or before July 5, 2011. (Michel, G)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SHANNON SECREASE,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
14
15
16
2: 09 - cv - 299 JAM TJB
vs.
JAMES WALKER,
Respondent.
ORDER
/
Petitioner Shannon Secrease is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition
17
for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In its February 21, 2001 opinion, the
18
California Court of Appeal vacated Petitioner’s sentence and remanded the matter back to the
19
trial court for resentencing. Subsequently, after Petitioner was resentenced Petitioner filed
20
another appeal. The California Court of Appeal affirmed on December 11, 2002. See People v.
21
Secrease, No. A097806, 2002 WL 31769077 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2002). Petitioner then filed
22
a petition for review to the California Supreme Court on January 21, 2003, case number
23
S112979. That court denied the petition for review on February 25, 2003. (See Pet’r’s Am. Pet.
24
Ex C.) To date, Respondent has not filed copies of Petitioner’s briefs that he filed to the
25
California Court of Appeal in case number A097806 or to the California Supreme Court in his
26
petition for review in case number S112979.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Respondent shall file copies of Petitioner’s briefs that he filed to the California
3
Court of Appeal in case number A097806 and to the California Supreme Court in
4
his petition for review in case number S112979 on or before July 5, 2011.
5
DATED: June 27, 2011
6
7
8
9
TIMOTHY J BOMMER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
