(PC) Evans v. Sisto et al, No. 2:2009cv00292 - Document 95 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/10/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 92 ADOPTED IN FULL; pltf's motion for temporary restraining order 91 92 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Evans v. Sisto et al Doc. 95 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES EVANS, JR., Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. FELKER, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. 2:09-cv-0292 WBS JFM (PC) Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2011, are adopted in full; 3 and 4 2. Plaintiff’s January 3, 2011 motion for temporary restraining order is denied. 5 6 DATED: February 10, 2011 7 8 9 10 11 12 /evan0292.805 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
