Gomez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 05/05/10 ORDERING Minor Plaintiff's counsel, Minor Plaintiff and Guardian ad litem be allowed to participate telephonically at the Motion Hearing set for 5/13/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.(Williams, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 HAMPTON & RAWLINGS Robert Keith Hampton (Tex. SBN 08876500) Clayton Rawlings (Tex. SBN 16589900) 1927 Norfolk Houston, Texas 77098 Telephone: [713] 520-7701 Facsimile: [713] 520-8612 LAW OFFICES OF BARRY A. ZIMMERMAN Barry A. Zimmerman (SBN 129208) 1515 Lincoln Way Auburn, California 95603 Telephone: [530] 823-0705 Facsimile: [530] 889-1711 Attorneys for Plaintiff SHELBY GOMEZ, by and through her guardian ad litem, Arnold Gomez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO SHELBY GOMEZ, a minor, by and through Her Guardian ad litem, ARNOLD GOMEZ Plaintiff, vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and DOES 1 - L, inclusive, Defendants, ) ) Case No.: 2:09-CV-00225 MCE-KJM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 ORDER 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Minor Plaintiff's counsel, Robert Keith Hampton 20 (713) 520-7701, Minor Plaintiff, Shelby Gomez, and Guardian ad litem, Arnold Gomez, be 21 allowed to participate in the upcoming hearing on Minor Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for 22 Approval of Compromise telephonically. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 1 Dated: May 5, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 APPROVAL & ENTRY REQUESTED: /s/ Robert Keith Hampton Robert Keith Hampton State Bar No. 08876500 Clayton Rawlings State Bar No. 16589900 HAMPTON & RAWLINGS 1927 Norfolk Houston, Texas 77098 Telephone: (713) 520-7701 Facsimile: (713) 520-8612 rkh72@aol.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?