(PC) Turner v. Sacramento County Jail, No. 2:2009cv00117 - Document 69 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 60 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and denying 46 Motion, 51 Motion, 52 Motion, 55 Motion and 56 Motion. Plaintiff's motion for production of documents is denied without prejudice signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/10. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Turner v. Sacramento County Jail Doc. 69 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAFONZO R. TURNER, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-0117 WBS KJN P vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 14 15 Defendants. / 16 17 ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 11, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 11, 2010, are adopted in full. 2 2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief concerning access to legal materials or 3 access to the prison law library (Dkt. Nos. 46, 51 and 52) are denied without prejudice. 4 3. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief concerning medical or mental health 5 treatment at California State Prison--L.A. County (Dkt. Nos. 55 and 56) are denied without 6 prejudice. 7 8 4. Plaintiff’s motion for production of documents is denied without prejudice. DATED: June 23, 2010 9 10 11 12 13 14 /turn0117.801 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.