Pandora Jewelry, LLC v. Bello Paradiso, LLC
Filing
135
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/04/10 ORDERING that plf's 115 Motion to De-Designate Bello's supplier information and documents is GRANTED in part. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. BELLO PARADISO, LLC, Defendant. / Plaintiff's motion to de-designate defendant's supplier information and documents came before the court for hearing on April 30, 2010. John Shaeffer was present in court and Bridget A. Short appeared telephonically as counsel for plaintiff. Thomas M. O'Leary was present in court as counsel for defendant. Upon consideration of the parties' briefs and arguments, and for the reasons stated in open court, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's April 2, 2010 motion to de-designate defendant's supplier information and documents (Doc. No. 115) is granted in part. 2. Documents and information about defendant's former suppliers of merchandise bearing the "Pandora Jewelry" mark, i.e., suppliers who are no longer supplying defendant with such merchandise, are not subject to designation as "Confidential," "Attorneys' 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PANDORA JEWELRY, LLC, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-3108 LKK DAD
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Eyes Only," or "Litigation Purposes Only." Documents and information about defendant's current suppliers of merchandise bearing the "Pandora Jewelry" mark, i.e., suppliers who continue to supply defendant with such merchandise, are not subject to designation as "Attorneys' Eyes Only" but remain subject to the designations "Confidential" and "Litigation Purposes Only" and shall be used by plaintiff and its counsel only in this litigation. DATED: May 4, 2010.
DAD:kw Ddad1/orders.civil/pandorajewelry3108.oah.043010
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
