Scott v. Sisto
Filing
21
AMENDED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/26/10 ORDERING the 20 Order is AMENDED as follows: Petitioner has 60 days in which to file a traverse. Respondent shall, within 7 days of the entry of the original order, file a response to the motion for a temporary restraining order, addressing petitioner's medical needs and the prison's provision for those needs now that petitioner is in administrative segregation. (Donati, J)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. D.K. SISTO, Respondent. / On May 26, 2010, the court entered an order granting petitioner's motion for an extension of sixty days in which to file a traverse. See docket no. 20. The court also ordered respondent to respond to petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order, addressing petitioner's medical needs and the prison's provision for those needs now that petitioner is in administrative segregation. Id. The time periods allowed in the order conflict with the time periods stated in the court's discussion of petitioner's motions. Therefore the court will clarify the time allowed both sides to comply with the court's order. ///// ///// ///// 1 AMENDED ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOEL PHILLIPE SCOTT, Petitioner, No. CIV S-08-2370 GEB KJM P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court's previous order (Docket No. 20) is amended as follows: 1. Petitioner has sixty days in which to file a traverse. 2. Respondent shall, within seven days of the entry of the original order, file a response to the motion for a temporary restraining order, addressing petitioner's medical needs and the prison's provision for those needs now that petitioner is in administrative segregation. DATED: May 26, 2010.
4 scot2370.am.ord.wpd
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
