Watts v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al
Filing
259
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 06/02/11 ORDERING that plf has until 07/15/11 to object to dfts' Bill of Costs and file a motion to tax costs. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
WENDY C. YORK (State Bar No. 166864)
JENNIFER B. EULER (State Bar No. 232378)
YORK LAW CORPORATION
1111 Exposition Boulevard, Building 500
Sacramento, CA 95815
Telephone: (916) 643-2200
Facsimile: (916) 643-4680
Email:
wyork@yorklawcorp.com
jeuler@yorklawcorp.com
KIMBERLY A. KRALOWEC, (State Bar No. 163158)
THE KRALOWEC LAW GROUP
188 The Embarcadero, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 546-6800
Facsimile: (415) 546-6801
Email:
kkralowec@kraloweclaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT WATTS
MARK HANOVER (Pro Hoc Vice)
SONIA MARTIN (State Bar No. 191148)
SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP
2121 North California Blvd., Suite 800
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 949-2600
Facsimile: (925) 949-2610
Email:
smartin@sonnenschein.com
mhanover@sonnenschein.com
Attorneys for Defendants
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, and
ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
21
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
23
24
ROBERT WATTS, on behalf of himself
individually and all other similarly situated,
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
vs.
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, an
Illinois corporation, ALLSTATE
INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois
CASE NO.: 2:08-CV-01877-LKK-GGH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE
OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO TAX
COSTS
Place:
Judge:
Courtroom 4, 15th Floor
Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE OBJECTIONS
AND MOTION TO TAX COSTS
1
2
corporation, ALLSTATE PROPERTY
AND CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
3
Defendants.
4
5
Plaintiff Robert Watts and Defendants Allstate, by and through their respective counsel of
6
record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
7
WHEREAS, the Court entered judgment in the present action on May 12, 2011 against
8
Robert Watts;
9
WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Bill of Costs on May 26, 2011 pursuant to Local Rule 292;
10
WHEREAS, Plaintiff will file objections to Defendants’ Bill of Costs;
11
WHEREAS, Plaintiff contends he must file objections to Defendants’ Bill of Costs by June
12
2, 2011;
13
WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred regarding Plaintiff’s deadline to object to
14
Defendants’ Bill of Costs and deadline to file a motion to tax costs;
15
WHEREAS, Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s request that the Court extend Plaintiff’s
16
deadline(s) to file said objections and/or motion by forty-five days;
17
WHEREAS, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 6(b) allows the Court to extend time, for
18
good cause, if the request to extend time is made before the original time expires;
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, with the Court’s approval, Plaintiff may object to
20
Defendants’ Bill of Costs and file a motion to tax costs up to and including July 18, 2011.
21
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
Respectfully submitted,
23
Dated: May 31, 2011
YORK LAW CORPORATION
24
25
26
27
28
By/s/ _______________________________
WENDY C. YORK
JENNIFER B. EULER
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT WATTS
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE OBJECTIONS
AND MOTION TO TAX COSTS
1
Dated: May 31, 2011
SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP
2
3
By/s/ _______________________________
SONIA MARTIN
Attorneys for Attorneys for Defendants
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY,
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, and
ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: June 2, 2011.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE OBJECTIONS
AND MOTION TO TAX COSTS
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
