Hollis v. Tell
Filing
39
ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 06/20/11 DENYING 36 38 Motions to Remand as moot. (Michel, G)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ROBERT D. HOLLIS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
E. TELL,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________)
No. 2:08-CV-01825 ODW
ORDER ON REMAND MOTION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff has filed Motions for Remand, [36] and [38] requesting orders
returning jurisdiction of this matter to the Superior Court of Sacramento
County. The remand motions are now moot given the court’s order dismissing
the complaint for failure to file an amended complaint within the 30 days
allowed. Indeed over two years passed without plaintiff filing an amended
complaint.
///
1
2
3
The motions for remand are moot in that the case has been dismissed and the
4
matter is closed.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: June 20, 2011
______________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
