Hoeckendorf v. Fairfield Police, et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 5/14/11 ORDERING this case is dismissed. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSHUA W. HOECKENDORRF
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPT.,
OFFICER SEAN TIMM and
OFFICER R. MROZ,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:08 cv-01782 ODW
17
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
18
Plaintiff while a state prisoner proceeding pro se, sought relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
19
§ 1983 and had requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 1915. By Order of this court entered January 24, 2011, that request was granted.
21
Notice of the Order was returned by the U. S. Postal Service as undeliverable and
22
no forwarding address has been filed with the court. Plaintiff is required to keep the Clerk
23
of Court advised of his current mailing address. Local Rule 83-182 Provides that “each
24
party appearing in propria persona is under a continuing duty to notify the Clerk and all
25
other parties of any change of address.” Plaintiff has failed to do so. He has also failed
26
1
1
2
to make even a partial payment of the $350 filing fee for this action.
Consequently, this action is hereby DISMISSED.
3
DATED: May 14, 2011
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
