Alfano et al v. BRP Inc. et al
Filing
54
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on March 25, 2010 ORDERING that the Court modifies the Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows: Completion of Non-Expert Discovery March 31, 2010; Joint Disclosure of Experts April 9, 2010;Joint Discl osure of Rebuttal Experts April 16, 2010; Parties to File Joint Mid-Litigation Statements April 16, 2010; All Dispositive Motions to be filed by May 5, 2010; Expert Discovery Cut Off May 31, 2010; Hearings on all Dispositive Motions June 2, 2010 at 9:30 a.m; Joint Pre-Trial Statement Due July 30, 2010;Pre-Trial Conference August 6, 2010 at 2:00 p.m; Trial Brief Due September 6, 2010; Trial September 20, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. (Becknal, R)
<![CDATA[
1 Ross Bozarth (Bar No.: 179171) Guenard & Bozarth, LLP 2 8830 Elk Grove Blvd. Elk Grove, CA 95624 3 Phone: (916) 714-7672 4 Fax: (916) 714-9031 Email: rbozarth@gblegal.com 5 Richard H. Friedman (Bar No.: 221622) 6 Kenneth R. Friedman, Pro Hac Vice William S. Cummings, Pro Hac Vice 7 Henry G. Jones, Pro Hac Vice 8 Friedman | Rubin 1126 Highland Ave. 9 Bremerton, WA 98337 Phone: (360) 783-4300 10 Fax: (360) 782-4358 11 Email: rfriedman@friedmanrubin.com kfriedman@friedmanrubin.com 12 wcummings@friedmanrubin.com 13 Don Bauermeister, Pro Hac Vice Burke & Bauermeister 14 921 W. 6th Avenue, Suite 250 15 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 688-4088 16 Fax: (907) 277-6111 Email: dcblaw@alaska.com 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 20 21
Scott M. Sarason, Pro Hac Vice Christina M. Paul, Pro Hac Vice Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A. 80 S.W. 8th Street Suite 3000 Miami, FL 33130 Phone: 305-358-5577 Fax: 305-371-7580 Email: ssarason@rumberger.com cpaul@rumberger.com William O. Martin, Jr. (Bar No. 135399) R. Bryan Martin (Bar No. 221684) Roxanne Irani (Bar No. 239457) HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP 6080 Center Driver, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045-1574 Telephone: (310) 215-7100 Facsimile: (310) 215-7300 Email: wmartin@hbblaw.com bmartin@hbblaw.com rirani@hbblaw.com Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:08-CV-01704-JAM-DAD STIPULATION TO AMEND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez Complaint Filed: July 23, 2008
22 NICOLE ALFANO and MICHAEL ALFANO, 23 Plaintiffs, 24 vs. 25 BRP Inc. and BRP US Inc., and DOES 1 26 through 50 inclusive, 27 28
LAW OFFICES
Defendants.
1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL, L.L.P. Los Angeles
BR30-0000057 3655811.1
ALFANO v. BRP, et al STIPULATION TO AMEND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1
WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed to stipulate to the continuance of certain
2 expert discovery deadlines; and 3 4 WHEREAS no party will be prejudiced as the result of such agreement; NOW THEREFORE Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective attorneys of
5 record, jointly request that the Court modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 The parties acknowledge that the proposed amended pre-trial scheduling order requires Completion of Non-Expert Discovery Joint Disclosure of Experts Joint Disclosure of Rebuttal Experts Parties to File Joint Mid-Litigation Statements All Dispositive Motions to be filed by Expert Discovery Cut Off Hearings on all Dispositive Motions Joint Pre-Trial Statement Due Pre-Trial Conference Trial Brief Due Trial March 31, 2010 April 9, 2010 April 16, 2010 April 16, 2010 May 5, 2010 May 31, 2010 June 2, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. July 30, 2010 August 6, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. September 6, 2010 September 20, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.
19 that dispositive motions be filed prior to the completion of expert discovery and at this time the 20 parties do not foresee any issues with these order of events. The parties further stipulate that all 21 discovery shall be completed by May 31, 2010. In this context, "completed" means that all 22 discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes 23 relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where 24 discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 ///
LAW OFFICES
2 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL, L.L.P. Los Angeles
BR30-0000057 3655811.1
ALFANO v. BRP, et al STIPULATION TO AMEND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1 Dated: March 25, 2010 2 3 4 5 6 Dated: March 25, 2010 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LAW OFFICES
FRIEDMAN RUBIN & WHITE
By:
/s/ Kenneth Freidman Kenneth R. Freidman Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP
By:
/s/ Roxanne Irani William O. Martin, Jr. Roxanne Irani Attorneys for Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 25, 2010
/s/ John A. Mendez________ Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Judge
3 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL, L.L.P. Los Angeles
BR30-0000057 3655811.1
ALFANO v. BRP, et al STIPULATION TO AMEND PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
