-KJN (PC) Johnson v. Sisto et al, No. 2:2008cv01609 - Document 82 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/5/2011 RECOMMENDING that pltf's claims against dfts Jones and Peterson be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-KJN (PC) Johnson v. Sisto et al Doc. 82 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LACEDRIC JOHNSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:08-cv-1609 KJM KJN P D.K. SISTO, et al., 14 15 16 Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed February 25, 2011, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and 17 return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on 18 defendants Jones and Peterson. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not 19 provided the necessary documents or responded to the court’s February 25, 2011 order. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants Jones and Peterson be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 23 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 24 twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 25 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: April 5, 2011 5 6 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 /john1609.fus 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
