Dixon v. O'Connor, et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lloyd D. George on 5/13/2010 GRANTING 10 Motion to Proceed IFP and 19 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Matson, R)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ________________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge May Dated this ____ day of April, 2010. Plaintiff Daniel Steve Dixon has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (#10) and a motion to amend his complaint (#19). The court has reviewed plaintiff's materials in support of his application to proceed in forma pauperis, and recognizes that plaintiff has heretofore submitted partial payment of $50 towards the filing fee. Based on plaintiff's representations, he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Furthermore, plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint will be granted. THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (#10) and his motion to amend his complaint (#19) are GRANTED. v. J.S. O'CONNOR, et al., Defendants. DANIEL STEVE DIXON, Plaintiff, ORDER 2:08-CV-01546-LDG IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
