(PS) Dillard et al v. Victoria M. Morton Enterprises, Inc. et al, No. 2:2008cv01339 - Document 56 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/28/10. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PS) Dillard et al v. Victoria M. Morton Enterprises, Inc. et al Doc. 56 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN DILLARD, et al., 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, No. 2:08-cv-01339 FCD KJN PS v. VICTORIA M. MORTON ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 RUTH GALTIERI-CARLSON, et al., 17 Plaintiffs, No. 2:08-cv-01777 FCD KJN PS 18 v. ORDER 19 20 21 22 23 VICTORIA M. MORTON ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ On June 8, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations in Galtieri- 24 Carlson v. Victoria M. Morton Enters., et al., No. 2:08-cv-01777 FCD KJN PS, which were 25 served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 26 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Dkt. No. 37.) No objections were 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 filed. 2 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 3 4 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 5 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 6 1983). 7 8 9 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 10 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 8, 2010, are ADOPTED; 11 2. The motion for voluntary dismissal is granted and defendant Victoria Morton, an 12 individual, is dismissed without prejudice from Galtieri-Carlson v. Victoria M. Morton Enters., 13 et al., No. 2:08-cv-01777 FCD KJN PS. 14 DATED: June 28, 2010. 15 16 17 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.