Govind v. Felker et al
Filing
44
ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 6/14/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff is reminded that compliance with discovery is not optional. Failure to submit to a duly noticed deposition without cause will result in dismissal of this case.(Duong, D)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DANIEL H. GOVIND,
) No. 2:08 CV-01183 ODW
)
Consolidated with
)
2:06CV 02467
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
ORDER
)
)
WARDEN FELKER, D. L. RUNNELS,)
)
)
)
Defendants
)
______________________________)
It has been brought to the court’s attention that Plaintiff is resisting
appearing for his deposition. Plaintiff is reminded that compliance with discovery
is not optional. Failure to submit to a duly noticed deposition without cause will
result in dismissal of this case.
DATED: June 14, 2011
______________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DISTRICT JUDGE
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
