USA v. Real Property Located at 3115 Claremont Drive, Oroville, CA
Filing
44
ORDER granting 42 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/9/11; 1. The claimant's motion for allowance of attorney's fees is GRANTED, and; 2. Judgment for attorney's fees in the amount of $ 4,074.30 is entered in favor of the Legal Services Corporation and against the United States. Payment is to be made directly to claimants counsel John Balazs. (Matson, R)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
John Balazs, Bar No. 157287
Attorney At Law
916 Second Street, Suite F
Sacramento, CA 95816
(916) 447-9299
John@Balazslaw.com
Attorney for Claimant Shirley Lacey
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
3115 CLAREMONT DRIVE,
OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA, BUTTE
COUNTY, APN: 079-010-012-0,
INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES
AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO,
Defendant.
22
No. 08-cv-1050 JAM- GGH PS
ORDER RE
ATTORNEY’S FEES
23
24
The court-appointed attorney for the claimant in this civil asset forfeiture case
25
26
has filed a motion seeking attorney’s fees in the amount of $ 4,074.30, to which the
27
28
1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
government does not object. As the rate of compensation and hours worked and
2
billed for appear reasonable, it is hereby ORDERED that:
3
1.
5
The claimant’s motion for allowance of attorney’s fees is GRANTED,
2.
4
Judgment for attorney’s fees in the amount of $ 4,074.30 is entered in
and;
6
7
8
9
favor of the Legal Services Corporation and against the United States. Payment is
to be made directly to claimant’s counsel John Balazs.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
15
Dated: 11/9/2011
/s/ John A. Mendez_____
U.S. District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
