USA v. Real Property Located at 3115 Claremont Drive, Oroville, CA, No. 2:2008cv01050 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/9/11 ORDERING The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties to this action. Judgment is hereby entered against Shirley E. Lacey and Barbar Howell, a nd all other potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action. W/in 30 days of from the date the stipulation is signed, claimants Lacey and Howell shall pay to the United States the sum of $5,000.00 (the "settlement amount" ;) as the substitute res in lieu of the forfeiture of the defendant real property. Claimants Lacey and Howell shall send a cashier's check for $5,000.00 made payable to the U.S. Marshals Service to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Attn: Ass et Forfeiture Unit, 501 I Street, Suite 10-100, Sacramento, CA 95814. All right, title, and interest in said funds shall be substituted for the defendant real property and forfeited to the United States to be disposed of according to law. W/in 30 da ys of full payment of the settlement amount, the United States shall record a withdrawal of the lis pendens against the defendant real property. Plaintiff United States of America and its servants, agents, and employees are hereby released from any and all liability arising out of or in any way connected with the filing of the Complaint and the posting of the defendant real property with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and unantici pated injuries, and/or damages arising out of or in any way connected with the filing of the Complaint and the posting of the defendant real property with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint, as well as to those now known or disclosed. There was re asonable cause for the posting of the defendant real property and the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action, and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause shall be entered accordingly. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. (Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
USA v. Real Property Located at 3115 Claremont Drive, Oroville, CA 1 2 3 4 5 Doc. 41 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney BOBBIE J. MONTOYA Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814-2322 Telephone: (916) 554-2775 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 17 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3115 CLAREMONT DRIVE, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA, BUTTE COUNTY, APN: 079-010-012-0, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, 18 Defendant. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:08-CV-01050-JAM-GGH FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE 19 20 Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture, the Court finds: 21 1. This is a civil forfeiture action against certain real property located at 3115 Claremont 22 Drive, Oroville, California, Butte County, APN: 079-010-012-0 (hereafter “defendant real 23 property”), and more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by 24 reference. 25 2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (hereafter “Complaint”) was filed on May 26 15, 2008, seeking the forfeiture of the defendant real property, alleging that said property is 27 subject to forfeiture to the United States of America pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 881(a)(6) and 28 881(a)(7). 1 Final Judgment of Forfeiture Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3. On May 28, 2008, the defendant real property was posted with a copy of the Complaint and Notice of Complaint. 3 4. On June 5, 12, 19, and 26, 2008, a Public Notice of Posting of the defendant real 4 property appeared by publication in The Oroville Mercury-Register, a newspaper of general 5 circulation in the county in which the defendant real property is located (Butte County). 6 a. Shirley E. Lacey 7 b. Barbar Jean Howell 8 c. Washington Mutual Bank 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 6. Claimants Shirley E. Lacey (“Lacey”) and Barbar Howell (“Howell”) filed verified claims and a joint answer alleging an interest in the defendant real property. 7. No other parties have filed claims or answers in this matter and the time for which any person or entity may file a claim and answer has expired. 8. Based on the above findings, and the files and records of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 9. The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties to this action. 10. Judgment is hereby entered against Shirley E. Lacey and Barbar Howell, and all other potential claimants who have not filed claims in this action. 11. Within thirty (30) days of from the date the stipulation is signed, claimants Lacey 20 and Howell shall pay to the United States the sum of $5,000.00 (the "settlement amount") as the 21 substitute res in lieu of the forfeiture of the defendant real property. 22 12. Claimants Lacey and Howell shall send a cashier’s check for $5,000.00 made 23 payable to the U.S. Marshals Service to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Attn: Asset Forfeiture Unit, 24 501 I Street, Suite 10-100, Sacramento, CA 95814. All right, title, and interest in said funds shall 25 be substituted for the defendant real property and forfeited to the United States pursuant to 21 26 U.S.C. §§ 881(a)(6) and 881(a)(7), to be disposed of according to law. 27 28 13. Within thirty (30) days of full payment of the settlement amount, the United States shall record a withdrawal of the lis pendens against the defendant real property. 2 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 14. Plaintiff United States of America and its servants, agents, and employees are hereby 2 released from any and all liability arising out of or in any way connected with the filing of the 3 Complaint and the posting of the defendant real property with the Complaint and Notice of 4 Complaint. This is a full and final release applying to all unknown and unanticipated injuries, 5 and/or damages arising out of or in any way connected with the filing of the Complaint and the 6 posting of the defendant real property with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint, as well as to 7 those now known or disclosed. The parties to the stipulation waived the provisions of California 8 Civil Code § 1542. 9 15. There was reasonable cause for the posting of the defendant real property and the 10 commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action, and a Certificate of Reasonable Cause 11 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 shall be entered accordingly. 12 16. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. 13 SO ORDERED THIS 9th day of March, 2011. 14 15 /s/ John A. Mendez JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE 20 Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture filed herein, and the 21 allegations set forth in the Complaint filed May 15, 2008, the Court enters this Certificate of 22 Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was reasonable cause for the posting 23 of the defendant real property with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint and for the 24 commencement and prosecution of this action. 25 Dated: 3/9/2011 /s/ John A. Mendez JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Judge 26 27 28 3 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 2 Exhibit A ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 3 4 5 A PORTION OF LOT 199, OROVILLE WYANDOTTE FRUIT LANDS UNIT NO. 6, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAP THEREOF, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MARCH 8, 1929, IN MAP BOOK 10, PAGES 3A, 4A AND 5A, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 199; THENCE NORTH 54 DEG. 35' WEST, ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 199, A DISTANCE OF 110.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46 DEG. 19' 30" WEST, 284.70 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF CLAREMONT AVENUE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CLAREMONT AVENUE, ON ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET AND CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22 DEG. 55' A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET (THE LONG CHORD OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 67 DEG. 12' 30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 99.33 FEET) TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 199; THENCE NORTH 51 DEG. 02' EAST, 266.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Final Judgment of Forfeiture
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
