(PC) Bjorlin v. Saro, No. 2:2008cv00914 - Document 54 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/28/2012 ORDERING 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; 49 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Defendant Gladney (sued as "Rooter") is DISMISSED from this action, which proceeds against defendant Saro ONLY. (Waggoner, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Bjorlin v. Saro Doc. 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL P. BJORLIN, 12 Plaintiff, vs. 13 14 No. CIV S-08-0914-LKK-CMK-P ORDER SARO, et al., Defendants. 15 / 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. On January 24, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 23 been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2012, are adopted in 4 2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 49) is granted; and 5 3. Defendant Gladney (sued as “Rooter”) is dismissed from this action, 3 6 7 full; which proceeds against defendant Saro only. DATED: March 28, 2012. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
