Daniel v. Padilla et al
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/3/2010, ORDERING that pltf's 70 Request for a Motion Hearing is DENIED w/out prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1
/014; vand0682.mot
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MELVIN DE VAN DANIEL, Plaintiff, vs. B. PADILLA, et al., Defendants. / On February 9, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for a motion hearing. In his request, plaintiff seeks a hearing on a "dispositive motion." His request, however, does not specify the nature of the "dispositive motion" other than to state that the defendants failed to follow proper police protocol when confronted with plaintiff, who was allegedly observed to be experiencing a "manic mental health episode." Plaintiff has not filed any documents or exhibits in support of his request. Due to the vague nature of plaintiff's request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 9, 2010 request is denied without prejudice. DATED: March 3, 2010. ORDER No. 2:08-cv-0682 WBS JFM (PS)
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
